« Cheney right on both counts; GOP breaking with W. | Main | The media and the Iraq parliament »

Kondracke: would genocide really be so bad?

No one would confuse Morton Kondracke of Roll Call and Fox with an expert on Iraq. Nevertheless, his latest comments reveal a double ignorance, If the "surge" fails, he says, Bush needs to consider "winning dirty" in Iraq by unleashing the Shiites and Kurds:

Winning will be dirty because it will allow the Shiite-dominated Iraqi military and some Shiite militias to decimate the Sunni insurgency. There likely will be ethnic cleansing, atrocities against civilians and massive refugee flows.

No one has publicly advocated this Plan B, and I know of only one Member of Congress who backs it — and he wants to stay anonymous. But he argues persuasively that it’s the best alternative available if Bush’s surge fails.

Not only is that a stupid idea, but it also describes almost perfectly what the United States is already doing, by arming and training Shiite-led militias, police and army units, while going after the Sunni resistance.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://robertdreyfuss.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/181

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 11, 2007 12:12 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Cheney right on both counts; GOP breaking with W..

The next post in this blog is The media and the Iraq parliament.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35