« Khalilzad: Oops, I meant the Sunnis are bad | Main | Zbig get it right on GWOT »

Effect of the "surge": not so good

According to iCasualties.org, the patterns of Iraqi deaths hasn't changed much since the U.S. escalation, or surge, began. They report that 1,802 Iraqi security forces and civilians died in January, 1,531 in February, and 1,134 so far in March, meaning that this month's total will pretty much match last month's. Among American forces, death totals are: 83 in January, 80 in February, and 70 so far in March.

Yesterday, NPR reported that morgue officials in Baghdad accuse the government of understating the number of deaths since the surge began, presumably for political reasons -- meaning that the supposedly lower figures for bodies turning up tortured, mutilated, and executed in the Iraqi capital are wrong. Still, those reported totals are creeping up again, with daily totals in the several dozens again.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://robertdreyfuss.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/164

Comments (1)

Kevin:

Casualty count is irrelevant. The "surge" is an oil spot strategy of withdrawaling troops from safehaven FOBs and imbedding them within urban centers, expanding city block by city bock with honeycombs of interlocking 24/7 platoon sized outposts. Casualties will mount because it further threatens the insurgencies ability to survive; however, over time it will recede. Your knowledge of counterinsurgency is quite clear...

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 24, 2007 11:55 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Khalilzad: Oops, I meant the Sunnis are bad.

The next post in this blog is Zbig get it right on GWOT.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35