« Civil War in Iraq: On Schedule | Main | Oliver Stone's missing postscript »

Khalilzad vs. the military on Iran

So it seems like the civilians in the Bush administration want to accuse Iran of causing all evil in Iraq, but the generals don’t.

Could that be because the generals realize that sparking a confrontation with Iran could be disastrous for U.S. forces in the region, while the civilians, including Ambassador Khalilzad, say: “Bring ‘em on!’?”

I’ll report—you decide. Both statements are from this week:

Khalilzad:

Iran has got Hizbollah in Lebanon. Iran has got some forces here. There is the possibility they might encourage those forces to create increased instability here.

General Caldwell, spokesman for U.S. forces in Iraq:

There is nothing that we definitively have found to say that there are any Iranians operating within the country of Iraq.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://robertdreyfuss.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/86

Comments (1)

Dahoumia:

I believe that there may be an Iranian individual called Grand Ayatollah Sistani operating in Iraq...

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 15, 2006 2:50 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Civil War in Iraq: On Schedule.

The next post in this blog is Oliver Stone's missing postscript.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35